Be able to hide name of a ressource in the controls settings

[idev_co]

When using RegisterKeyMapping, we see the name of the resource in the settings. It would be better to add a server convar ( sv_hideResourceName) that allows us to hide the resource name, looking cleaner by omitting the resource name. Same for RedM, idk if RegisterKeyMapping exist on RedM tho

[giocatore]

So what do you do when your users need to identify which “close menu” they are trying to bind when multiple scripts use the same language? Or just be able to identify which keybind belongs to which script when they are trying to troubleshoot.

[idev_co]

Then comment the convar while your debugging

[Kiminaze]

I really don’t mind the resource name, but I do mind the order they are displayed in!

If all the controls for a single resource would at least be grouped together and then sorted alphabetically and not just alphabetically in general.

[tens0rfl0w]

Keybindings Settings: Resource name hidden unless on canary

The resource name is relevant as it is related to persistence: the binds will persist based on the resource name, even on different servers, so as a ‘end user’ it is in fact relevant information. I’m rather wondering what use case there is for hiding it at all- do people actually get confused here or is this just a nitpick? (mainly as I’m actually expecting user confusion if ‘showing/hiding’ is somehow tied to an arbitrary toggle like canary - as then it’s suddenly inconsistent!)

[AvarianKnight]

I’m not quite sure how having the resource name on would convey this information anyways, its mostly just an annoyance imo.