Qbox Project [WIP]

actually it wasnt complaints it was very constructive they were questions that were responded to toxicity?

  1. WHY CHANGE EVERYTHING TO OX AND CLAIM QB? why not just improve on ox_lib using the open source qb resources?
    2)Why put someone down for not creditting people then not credit peoples stuff you use?
  2. who on here puts all of there stuff on github and none of their own work is on tebex?
3 Likes

It’s quite simple… If you don’t like this project or the thread don’t comment on it and move on… How is this affecting anything you are currently doing?..

Where in my comment did I tell a lie or trash talk? I’ll wait…

1 Like

The second part doesn’t make any sense at all? And what do you mean change everything to Ox?

Now give me one reason not to use Ox_lib? I’m sorry that we aren’t following QBCore standards by forking the resource and renaming it to qb-lib. Meanwhile removing all the funding links to the original creator.

  • Ox_target: The current maintainer @berkieb literally said himself that he won’t be maintaining it anymore. BerkieB himself is also actively contributing too and has said that Ox_target is better and more optimized.

While both resources do exactly the same give me a reason not to use Ox_target. Also I wish QBCore good luck with the qb-target resource without anyone maintaining it.

  • Ox_doorlock: Remember nui_doorlock? The resource that qb-doorlock yoinked from. Meanwhile violating license terms. Awesome!

Also fun fact, the creator of nui_doorlock which was loved by all is the creator of Ox_doorlock. So it goes without saying that it’s a great resource.

Has nothing to do with us or this whole conversation.

Not entirely sure what PR you are talking about. And if it is this one… You really that mad for 2 lines? Also isn’t that what open source projects are for? So others can learn from it?

4 Likes

Firstly thank you for answer my questions i have had an eye on some of the stuff and i dont disagree with the work at all! And you are absolutely correct that is the glory of an open source project the only reasob i asked these things are recognition and a tebex were two of the things mentions in the statements above. I guess realistically i didnt understand how items such as those would bring people to speak so radhly on eachother honestly. I will keep an eye to see what improvements you do regaurdless of how i am treated because no matter where knowledge comes from im always open yo learn new things

1 Like

why even stick to qb if ur making it all ox?

Using a few standalone resources doesn’t make it ā€œall oxā€.

why not just go developre for ox

They want to use qb.

this was all to start a bunch of drama

No it was because Kakarot is a con artist and a literal thief.

i was excited to hopefully see some other good works from the core but one of the biggest performance updates u pushed soo far u stole from me

Prove they ā€œstoleā€ from you.

I wish you luck with OXcore because thats what it is it isnt qb ur remastering at all at this point anymore so stop fooling the people plz

Literally using qb-core and other qb resources.

i finally put my two sense in on ur mess of a stab at kakarot

How is this ā€œa stabā€ at Kakarot? His own actions are the problem.

for what dude all i see here is a bunch of people running their mouth

Pot, meet kettle.

yeah you guys are doin a real good job suggesting shit by stealing my pr and using it on ur own project

Prove they ā€œstoleā€ from you.

i wish u no luck on ur holiday because ur wishes are fake.

You probably missed the joke.
image

WHY CHANGE EVERYTHING TO OX AND CLAIM QB?

WHY IS THIS IN CAPITALS?

who on here puts all of there stuff on github and none of their own work is on tebex?

I’d like to say none of my work is on Tebex, but it’s FiveM so somebody is 100% selling my code.

idk the whole story there to speak on it but really thats between them for a man whos word of mouth is better than anything

Who’s ā€œword of mouthā€? Kakarot’s? Most of what he says is garbage and can’t be trusted, and you’re suggesting Gabz lied about getting screwed over.

i havent been trying to sit here and thrash on anyone

Aside from anybody who doesn’t agree with you.

Dont try and play like your comment wasnt ill directed… why not just call me a slur next?

Probably wouldn’t get past moderation.

9 Likes

Does anyone else find it funny how he’s complaining how a few standalone ox resources are used but QBCore uses standalone resources such as progressbars and polyzones?

4 Likes

Mainly because of the whole point of ox_lib is meant to be framework independent because then if new features are added for one framework but not the other people will complain that their framework doesn’t support this feature. Really the only things that are framework dependent is the getCore module which just has some framework support stuff and I believe isn’t even really supported.

1 Like

Yeah it was experimental / WIP, but I couldn’t really be bothered working on it.
Only used in ox_doorlock and people have had issues (probably just from renaming core tbh).

Also why it isn’t documented, and it is now marked deprecated.

2 Likes

I unfortunately do have to say that if you want to continue this, do so in private messages. I already accepted quite a lot on this thread by the generosity of the moderators. Keep it somewhat around the general project and don’t make it personal :slightly_smiling_face:.

8 Likes

If the project have ChatDisabled & Berkie you know it’s going to be good stuff, easy as that.

Also, Using any OX resource is way better and way more optimized than any old QB stuff, using outdated JS and other old crap.

More and more stuff will move to OX’s resources because it is superior, easy as that.

13 Likes

Best logo : )

2 Likes

and what is the real different between this and og qb

Explained in great detail multiple times on this thread and elsewhere. Besides that I can’t really say more than to look at the code and see for yourself.

[[ Small edit: Just in case people see this old comment,
I have now been proven wrong. I would highly suggest using QBox over QB-Core and am happy for the team and I’m thankful to them for providing a more stable framework and nicer community.
]]

i at being a dick but looking in the thread cant really see what the different apart from people arguing about this and saying the is no diffrens apart from you working on it and i have look but it just looks the same as qb but using more ox

1 Like

Man after reading all the comments on this thread WOWWWW! Crazy this seems to happen in a lot of communities but what also was crazy to see is the framework being developed while it’s all going on. Great work wish I would have seen this earlier! Will be following this thread and your updates!

1 Like

Lots of new updates on this, nice

1 Like

give them to me, I’ll collect them for you ahhahahaha :rofl: :rofl: